May be the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?
Puff Bar is a great alternative to a normal ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with vapinger.com an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is really a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it as often as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because you can serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, that was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose weight can easily do so if they only need to take with you the small product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Based on the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows you to put it into the mouth area, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you may go. If the product also has an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. In addition to sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco in to the marketplace.
And also the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes available could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to the younger generations, this could substantially reduce the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not supply them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on the products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will purchase them.